4.5 Review

Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW
卷 114, 期 2, 页码 376-397

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.376

关键词

stop-signal task; cognitive control; frontal eye field; cognitive modeling; stochastic decision models

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P30HD015052] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY008126, F32EY016679, R01EY013358] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH055806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NEI NIH HHS [P30-EY08126, R01-EY13358, F32-EY016679] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NICHD NIH HHS [P30-HD015052] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [R01-MH55806] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stop-signal task has been used to study normal cognitive control and clinical dysfunction. Its utility is derived from a race model that accounts for performance and provides an estimate of the time it takes to stop a movement. This model posits a race between go and stop processes with stochastically independent finish times. However, neurophysiological studies demonstrate that the neural correlates of the go and stop processes produce movements through a network of interacting neurons. The juxtaposition of the computational model with the neural data exposes a paradox-how can a network of interacting units produce behavior that appears to be the outcome of an independent race? The authors report how a simple, competitive network can solve this paradox and provide an account of what is measured by stop-signal reaction time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据