4.6 Article

Combined p19Arf and interferon-beta gene transfer enhances cell death of B16 melanoma in vitro and in vivo

期刊

CANCER GENE THERAPY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 317-325

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2013.23

关键词

p53; p14Arf/p19Arf; interferon; melanoma; adenovirus; cell death

资金

  1. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [06/57823-5, 2010/03958-2, 07/50210-0, 11/50911-0]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/03958-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately 90% of melanomas retain wild-type p53, a characteristic that may help shape the development of novel treatment strategies. Here, we employed an adenoviral vector where transgene expression is,controlled by p53 to deliver the p19 alternate reading frame (An) and interferon-beta (IFN beta) complementary DNAs in the B16 mouse model of melanoma. In vitro, cell death was enhanced by combined gene transfer (63.82 +/- 15.30% sub-GO cells); yet introduction of a single gene resulted in significantly fewer hypoploid cells (37.73 +/- 7.3% or 36.96 +/- 11.58%, p19Arf or IFN beta, respectively, P < 0.05). Annexin V staining and caspase-3 cleavage indicate a cell death mechanism consistent with apoptosis. Using reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR, we show that key transcriptional targets of p53 were upregulated in the presence of p19Arf, although treatment with IFN beta did not alter expression of the genes studied. In situ gene therapy revealed significant inhibition of subcutaneous tumors by IFN beta (571 +/- 25 mm(3)) or the combination of p19Arf and IFN beta (489 +/- 124 mm(3)) as compared with the LacZ control (1875 +/- 33 mm(3), P < 0.001); whereas p19Arf yielded an intermediate result (1053 +/- 169 mm(3), P < 0.01 vs control). However, only the combination was associated with increased cell death and prolonged survival (P < 0.01). As shown here, the combined transfer of p19Arf and IFN beta using p53-responsive vectors enhanced cell death both in vitro and in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据