4.2 Article

Ectoderm- and endomesoderm-specific GATA transcription factors in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilli

期刊

EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 39-50

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00136.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R24GM071478] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM071478] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The GATA family of transcription factors appears to retain conserved roles in early germ layer patterning in most, if not all, animals; however, the number and structure of GATA factor genes varies substantially when different animal genomes are compared. Thus, the origin and relationships of invertebrate and vertebrate GATA factors, and their involvement in animal germ layer evolution, are unclear. We identified two highly conserved GATA factor genes in a marine annelid, the polychaete Platynereis dumerilii. A phylogenetic analysis indicates that the two Platynereis GATA factors are orthologous to the GATA1/2/3 and GATA4/5/6 subfamilies present in vertebrates. We also identified conserved motifs within each GATA class, and assigned the divergent Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster GATA factor genes to the vertebrate classes. Similar to their vertebrate homologs, PdGATA123 mRNA expression was restricted to ectoderm, whereas PdGATA456 was detected only in endomesoderm. Finally, we identified in genome databases one GATA factor gene in each of two distantly related cnidarians that include motifs from both bilaterian GATA factor classes. Our results show that distinct orthologs of the two vertebrate GATA factor classes exist in a protostome invertebrate, suggesting that bilaterian GATA factors originated from GATA1/2/3 and 4/5/6 ancestral orthologs. Moreover, our results indicate that the GATA gene duplication and the functional divergence that led to these two ancestral GATA factor genes occurred after the split of the bilaterian stem group from the cnidarians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据