4.1 Article

Photobiont selectivity in the epiphytic lichens Hypogymnia physodes and Lecanora conizaeoides

期刊

LICHENOLOGIST
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 195-204

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282907006639

关键词

chlorophyta; ITS nrDNA sequences; photobiont specificity; taxonomy; toxitolerance; Trebouxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In two lichen species, Hypogymnia physodes and Lecanora conizaeoides, often used as model organisms for pollution-sensitive and pollution-tolerant epiphytic lichens, respectively, the hypothesis was tested that the toxitolerance of the Trebouxia photobiont limits the tolerance of the entire lichen symbiosis. Being lecanoralean-trebouxioid associations, H. physodes and L. conizaeoides represent the most common type of lichens. Photobionts of both lichen species deriving from microhabitats with varying supply of S and heavy metals were identified using nuclear ITS nrDNA sequencing. The photobiont of L. conizaeoides was identified as T. simplex, whereas the photobiont of H. physodes belongs to an undescribed Trebouxia species, related to T. jamesii subsp. angustilobata and provisionally named as T. hypogymniae Hauck & Friedl ined. Since T. hypogymniae ined. is also known from Lecidea silacea, which is characteristic of rock and slag with high heavy metal content, a high sensitivity of this alga to pollutants is unlikely to be a key factor for the relatively low toxitolerance of H. physodes. Furthermore, the photobiont cannot be crucial for the extremely high toxitolerance of L. conizaeoides, as T simplex is also known from pollution-sensitive lichens of the fruticose genus Pseudevernia. These findings suggest that the photobiont is not generally a key factor determining pollution sensitivity in the most common type of lichen symbiosis. The high specificity for T. simplex in L. conizaeoides in existing populations of L. conizaeoides suggest that already established thalli could be a source of photobiont cells for re-lichenization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据