4.1 Review

Drug-induced long QT and torsade de pointes: recent advances

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 39-43

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32801129eb

关键词

adverse drug reaction; long QT syndrome; pharmacogenetics; reduced repolarization reserve; torsade de pointes

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [U01HL065962, U19HL065962, K23HL076264] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00095] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL076264, HL65962] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review A wide array of drugs can cause marked QT prolongation with the associated risk of torsade de pointes. The large number of drugs with this potential, the correspondingly large number of patients exposed to such drugs, and the potentially fatal outcome make drug-induced long QT syndrome an important public health problem. This review focuses on mechanisms underlying QT prolongation and proarrhythmia, risk factors, including the role of genetic variants, and the unifying framework of reduced repolarization reserve. Recent findings While most drugs that prolong the QT block a specific potassium channel, novel mechanisms altering protein trafficking have been discovered. The progression to torsade de pointes may be less related to degree of QT prolongation than to drug effects on transmural dispersion or variability of repolarization. Our understanding of certain predisposing risk factors has been further refined. Summary Ongoing research continues to elucidate the mechanisms underlying drug-induced long QT syndrome. Importantly, studies are establishing improved predictors of risk for progression to torsade de pointes, in addition to the degree of QT prolongation, which is an imperfect predictor. Nonetheless, drug-induced long QT syndrome and torsade de pointes pose unique challenges for clinicians, researchers, drug-development programs, and regulatory agencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据