4.6 Article

Combination therapy with radiation or cisplatin enhances the potency of Ad5/35 chimeric oncolytic adenovirus in a preclinical model of head and neck cancer

期刊

CANCER GENE THERAPY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 383-392

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2008.90

关键词

radiation therapy; cisplatin therapy; oncolytic adenovirus; efficacy; survival; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ad5/35 chimeric oncolytic viruses (OVs) have earlier been shown to increase the level of vector transduction, intratumoral virus spread and survival in a number of xenograft models when compared with Ad5-based viruses. Because radiation and chemotherapy are the current standards of care for most cancer indications, Ad5/35 OVs have been tested here in combination with either radiation or chemotherapy in a head and neck cancer ( HNC) xenograft model to determine whether such combination therapies enhance the potency of the virus, thereby leading to a greater therapeutic effect. In mice treated with either Ad5 OV (OV-5) or Ad5/35 chimeric OV (OV-5T35H), there was a delay in tumor progression compared with animals treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) alone. When Ad5/35 chimeric OV and radiation were used in combination, there was a further delay in tumor progression, which resulted in a significant increase in the mean survival time of tumor-bearing mice compared with Ad5/35 or Ad5 OV monotherapy or to the combination of Ad5 OV with radiation, which was significantly less potent (P<0.0001) compared with the Ad5/35 OV plus radiation combination. Similarly, a combination of Ad5/35 chimeric OV with cisplatin significantly delayed tumor progression compared with Ad5/35 OV or Ad5 OV virus alone or with the combination of Ad5 virus with cisplatin (P<0.01). In summary, the combination of the potent Ad5/35 chimeric OV with either radiation or chemotherapy leads to significantly increased survival of mice bearing highly aggressive tumors, and may therefore offer an effective treatment strategy for patients with difficult to treat HNC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据