4.5 Article

Obesity and Thyroid Cancer Risk among US Men and Women: A Pooled Analysis of Five Prospective Studies

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 464-472

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1220

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Thyroid cancer incidence has risen dramatically in the United States since the early 1980s. Although the prevalence of obesity has doubled during this time period, the relationship between obesity and thyroid cancer is uncertain. Methods: We examined the association between body mass index (BMI) and thyroid cancer risk in a pooled analysis of five prospective U.S. studies, including 413,979 women and 434,953 men. Proportional hazards models with attained age as the time metric were adjusted for education, race, marital status, smoking, alcohol intake, and (where appropriate) cohort and sex. Results: Over follow-up (mean = 10.3 years), 768 women and 388 men were diagnosed with thyroid cancer. The risk of thyroid cancer was greater with increasing BMI [per 5 kg/m(2): HR in women, 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08-1.24); HR in men, 1.21 (95% CI, 0.97-1.49)]. There was no significant heterogeneity between studies (both P > 0.05). For women and men combined, the HRs for overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)) and obesity (>= 30 kg/m(2)) compared with normal-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)) were 1.20 (95% CI, 1.04-1.38) and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.31-1.79), respectively. We found no significant effect modification by other factors, and the results did not differ significantly by histologic type. A significant positive association for BMI in young adulthood (ages 18-20) with thyroid cancer risk was also observed [per 5-kg/m(2) increase: HR, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.03-1.35)]. Conclusion: BMI was positively associated with thyroid cancer risk in both men and women. Impact: Our study provides strong evidence that obesity is an independent risk factor for thyroid cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(3); 464-72. (C)2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据