4.7 Article

Quantum Riemann-Roch, Lefschetz and Serre

期刊

ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS
卷 165, 期 1, 页码 15-53

出版社

ANNALS MATHEMATICS, FINE HALL
DOI: 10.4007/annals.2007.165.15

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given a holomorphic vector bundle E over a compact Kahler manifold X, one defines twisted Gromov-Witten invariants of X to be intersection numbers in moduli spaces of stable maps f : E -> X with the cap product of the virtual fundamental class and a chosen multiplicative invertible characteristic class of the virtual vector bundle H-0(Sigma, f*E) circle minus H-1(Sigma, f*E). Using the formalism of quantized quadratic Hamiltonians [25], we express the descendant potential for the twisted theory in terms of that for X. This result (Theorem 1) is a consequence of Mumford's Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem applied to the universal family over the moduli space of stable maps. It determines all twisted Gromov-Witten invariants, of all genera, in terms of untwisted invariants. When E is concave and the C-x-equivariant inverse Euler class is chosen as the characteristic class, the twisted invariants of X give Gromov-Witten invariants of the total space of E. Nonlinear Serre duality [21], [23] expresses Gromov-Witten invariants of E in terms of those of the super-manifold HE: it relates Gromov-Witten invariants of X twisted by the inverse Euler class and E to Gromov-Witten invariants of X twisted by the Euler class and E*. We derive from Theorem. I nonlinear Serre duality in a very general form (Corollary 2). When the bundle E is convex and a submanifold Y subset of X is defined by a global section of E, the genus-zero Gromov-Witten invariants of HE coincide with those of Y. We establish a quantum Lefschetz hyperplane section principle (Theorem 2) expressing genus-zero Gromov-Witten invariants of a complete intersection Y in terms of those of X. This extends earlier results [4], [9], [18], [29], [33] and yields most of the known mirror formulas for toric complete intersections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据