4.5 Article

Metformin and Incident Breast Cancer among Diabetic Women: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Denmark

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 101-111

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0817

关键词

-

资金

  1. Karen Elise Jensen Foundation
  2. Danish Medical Research Council [09-067009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Preliminary evidence suggests that metformin may decrease breast cancer risk by decreasing insulin levels and reducing cell proliferation. We evaluated the effect of metformin medication on the risk of incident breast cancer among peri- and postmenopausal women. Methods: We used Danish medical registries to conduct a nested case-control study among type 2 diabetic women 50 years or older who resided in northern Denmark from 1989 to 2008 (n = 4,323). We identified 393 diabetic cases and used risk-set sampling to select 10 diabetic controls per case (n = 3,930) matched on county of residence. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were estimated by conditional logistic regression associating metformin use with breast cancer occurrence. Results: Ninety-six cases (24%) and 1,154 controls (29%) used metformin for at least 1-year duration. Cases were slightly older on average than controls, but they were similar in distribution for parity, use of hormone replacement therapy, and history of diabetes complications. Metformin users were less likely with a diagnosis of breast cancer (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.61-0.99) than nonmetformin users. Adjustment for diabetes complications, clinically diagnosed obesity, and important predictors of breast cancer did not substantially alter the association (OR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.63-0.96). Conclusion: Our results suggest that metformin may protect against breast cancer in type 2 diabetic peri-or postmenopausal women. Impact: This study supports the growing evidence of a role for metformin in breast cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(1); 101-11. (C) 2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据