4.2 Article

Peripheral site acetylcholinesterase blockade induces RACK1 - Associated neuronal remodeling

期刊

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
卷 4, 期 2-3, 页码 171-184

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000101842

关键词

acetylcholinesterase; RACK1; neuronal remodeling; BW284C51; alternative splicing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Peripheral anionic site (PAS) blockade of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) notably affects neuronal activity and cyto-architecture, however, the mechanism(s) involved are incompletely understood. Objective: We wished to specify the PAS extracellular effects on specific AChE mRNA splice variants, delineate the consequent cellular remodeling events, and explore the inhibitory effects on interchanging RACKI interactions. Methods: We exposed rat hippocampal cultured neurons to BW284C51, the peripheral anionic site inhibitor of AChE, and to the non-selective AChE active site inhibitor, physostigmine for studying the neuronal remodeling of AChE mRNA expression and trafficking. Results: BW284C51 induced overexpression of both AChE splice variants, yet promoted neuritic translocation of the normally rare ACH-R, and retraction of AChE-S mRNA in an antisense-sup-pressible manner. BW284C51 further caused modest decreases in the expression of the scaffold protein RACK1 (receptor for activated protein kinase P11), followed by drastic neurite retraction of both RACK1 and the AChE homologue neuroligin1, but not the tubulin-associated MAP2 protein. Accompanying BW284C51 effects involved decreases in the Fyn kinase and membrane insertion of the glutamate receptor NR2B variant and impaired glutamatergic activities of treated cells. Intriguingly, molecular modeling suggested that direct, non-catalytic competition with Fyn binding by the RACKI-interacting AChE-R variant may be involved. Conclusions: Our findings highlight complex neuronal AChE-R/RACK1 interactions and are compatible with the hypothesis that peripheral site AChE inhibitors induce RACK1-mediated neuronal remodeling, promoting suppressed glutamatergic neurotransmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据