3.9 Article

Early traumatic experience in obsessive-compulsive disorders: A pilot study

期刊

VERHALTENSTHERAPIE
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 243-250

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000109739

关键词

obsessive-compulsive disorder; sexual abuse; physical abuse; neglect; cognitive behavioural therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Early traumatic experiences are discussed as risk factors for the development of psychiatric disorders and are suspected to influence treatment and outcome. Yet, few empirical studies have assessed the association between these life events and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Especially the role of emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect has rarely been examined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of early traumatic experiences in patients with OCD and the impact of such experiences on OCD severity and symptom features as well as on treatment outcome. Patients and Methods: 41 patients fulfilling criteria of OCD were investigated with several instruments (Structured Trauma Interview, STI; Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, CTQ; Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, Y-BOCS etc.) before and after treatment. Patients were consecutively referred to a behaviour therapy inpatient unit. Treatment consisted of an individualized and multimodal cognitive behaviour therapy (with or without drug therapy). Results: The findings indicate a high prevalence of childhood traumatic experiences in OCD patients. Traumatic experiences were associated with a higher level of psychiatric symptoms in general, depressive symptoms and severity of OCD (on a trend level). The results are not supportive of a relationship between traumatic experiences and treatment failure. Conclusion: Adverse childhood experiences such as abuse and neglect are relatively prevalent among patients with OCD. These experiences are associated with greater psychopathology, but not necessarily with an unfavourable outcome. Recommendations for the treatment of these patients are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据