4.5 Review

Association of Area Socioeconomic Status and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 2579-2599

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Texas School of Public Health Cancer Education and Career Development Program
  2. NIH/National Cancer Institute [2 R25 CA 57712, RO1 CA97263, RO1 CA112223]
  3. Barnes Jewish Hospital Foundation
  4. Siteman Cancer Center Prevention and Control Program
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA097263, R01CA112223, R25CA057712] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although numerous studies have examined the association of area socioeconomic status (SES) and cancer screening after controlling for individual SES, findings have been inconsistent. A systematic review of existing studies is timely to identify conceptual and methodologic limitations and to provide a basis for future research directions and policy. Objective: The objectives were to (a) describe the study designs, constructs, methods, and measures; (b) describe the independent association of area SES and cancer screening; and (c) identify neglected areas of research. Methods: We searched six electronic databases and manually searched cited and citing articles. Eligible studies were published before 2008 in peer-reviewed journals in English, represented primary data on individuals ages >= 18 years from developed countries, and measured the association of area and individual SES with breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening. Results: Of 19 eligible studies, most measured breast cancer screening. Studies varied widely in research design, definitions, and measures of SES, cancer screening behaviors, and covariates. Eight employed multilevel logistic regression, whereas the remainder analyzed data with standard single-level logistic regression. The majority measured one or two indicators of area and individual SES; common indicators at both levels were poverty, income, and education. There was no consistent pattern in the association between area SES and cancer screening. Discussion: The gaps and conceptual and methodologic heterogeneity in the literature to date limit definitive conclusions about an underlying association between area SES and cancer screening. We identify five areas of research deserving greater attention in the literature. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(10):2579-99)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据