4.5 Article

DJ-1 Could Predict Worse Prognosis on Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 3593-3602

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0214

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have revealed an oncogenic role of DJ-1 through its ability to transform normal cells, prevent oxidative damage, and inhibit apoptosis. However, its role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unknown. In this study, by immunohistochemistry, we analyzed the expression of DJ-1. in 81 ESCC tumors, 31 paired nonneoplastic esophageal epithelia, and 1.9 paired ESCC lymph node metastases. We found that cytoplasmic DJ-1, expression was significantly higher in ESCC and ESCC lymph node metastases than in nonneoplastic esophageal epithelium. ESCC specimens with high distant metastatic potential also had a significantly higher level of nuclear DJ-1 expression (P = 0.018). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, we found that a high level of nuclear DJ-1 was significantly associated with poorer patient survival in our cohort (P = 0.028). To investigate whether DJ-1 promotes ESCC progression through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and modulation of apoptosis, we performed immunohistochemistry of pAkt and Daxx. We found that DJ-1 expression was significantly associated with pAkt, whereas nuclear DJ-1 expression was significantly correlated with nuclear expression of Daxx. These results suggest that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and Daxx-regulated apoptosis might be important in DJ-1-mediated ESCC progression. By using multivariate Cox regression, we further showed that T-4 stage (P = 0.003) and DJ-1 (P = 0.034) are independent predictors of patient survival. In conclusion, our results suggest that DJ-1 plays a very important role in transformation and progression of ESCC and may be used as a prognostic marker in ESCC. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(12):3593-602)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据