4.5 Article

Association of genetic variation in genes implicated in the β-catenin destruction complex with risk of breast cancer

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 2101-2108

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0134

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA128978-01A2, R01 CA128978, R25 CA092049] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant Wnt/beta-catenin signaling leading to nuclear accumulation of the oncogene product beta-catenin is observed in a wide spectrum of human malignancies. The destruction complex in the Writ/beta-catenin pathway is critical for regulating the level of beta-catenin in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. Here, we report a comprehensive study of the contribution of genetic variation in six genes encoding the beta-catenin destruction complex (APC, AXIN1, AXIN2, CSNK1D, CSNK1E, and GSK3B) to breast cancer using a Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Case-Control Study. A total of 79 candidate functional and tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were gencityped in 798 invasive cases and 843 unaffected controls. Of these, rs454886 in the APC tumor suppressor gene was associated with increased breast cancer risk (per allele odds ratio, 1.23; 95%, confidence intervals, 1.05-1.43; P-trend = 0.01). In addition, five SNPs in AXIN2 were associated with increased risk of breast cancer (P-trend < 0.05). Haplotype-based tests identified significant associations between specific haplotypes in APC and AXTN2 (P <= 0.03) and breast cancer risk. Further characterization of the APC and AXIN2 variants suggested that AXIN2 rs4791171 was significantly associated with risk in premenopausal (P-trend = 0.0002) but not in postmenopausal women. The combination of our findings and numerous genetic and functional studies showing that APC and AXIN2 perform crucial tumor suppressor functions suggest that further investigation of the contribution of AXIN2 and APC SNPs to breast cancer risk are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据