4.3 Article

Telomere length and risk of glioma

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 935-938

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.10.002

关键词

Telomere length; Glioma; Epidemiology; Cancer risk

资金

  1. intramural research program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Telomere length in blood or buccal cell DNA has been associated with risk of various cancers. Glioma can be a highly malignant brain tumor and has few known risk factors. Genetic variants in or near RTEL1 and TERT, key components of telomere biology, are associated with glioma risk. Therefore, we evaluated the association between relative telomere length (RTL) and glioma in a prospective study. Materials and methods: We performed a nested case-control study within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. RTL was determined by quantitative PCR on blood or buccal cell DNA obtained at least 2 years prior to diagnosis from 101 individuals with glioma cases. Healthy controls (n = 198) were matched to cases (2:1) on age, gender, smoking status, calendar year, and DNA source. Conditional logistic regression was used to investigate the association between RTL and glioma. Results: As expected, RTL declined with increasing age in both cases and controls. There was no statistically significant association between RTL and glioma overall. An analysis stratified by gender suggested that short RTL (1st tertile) in males was associated with glioma (odds ratio, [ OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-5.11); this association was not observed for females (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.14-1.17). Conclusions: This prospective study did not identify significant associations between RTL and glioma risk, but there may be gender-specific differences. Larger, prospective studies are needed to evaluate these findings. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据