4.3 Article

Telomere length and risk of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 434-439

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.02.010

关键词

Telomeres; Melanoma; Squamous cell carcinoma; Basal cell carcinoma; Case-control

资金

  1. State of Florida's James and Esther King Biomedical Research Program [06NIR-08]
  2. Comprehensive Melanoma Research Center at Moffitt Cancer Center
  3. National Cancer Institute [R25T CA147832]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Telomeres help maintain chromosomal structure and may influence tumorigenesis. We examined the association between telomere length and skin cancer in a clinic-based case-control study of 198 melanoma cases, 136 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases, 185 basal cell carcinoma (BCC) cases, and 372 healthy controls. Methods: Cases were histologically confirmed patients treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida Dermatology Clinic in Tampa, FL. Controls self-reported no history of cancer and underwent a skin cancer screening exam at study enrollment to rule out the presence of skin cancer. Quantitative real time PCR was used to measure telomere length in peripheral blood samples. Results: Melanoma patients had longer telomeres than controls (odds ratio (OR) = 3.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.02-6.94 for highest versus lowest tertile) (P for trend = <0.0001). In contrast, longer telomere length was significantly inversely associated with SCC (OR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00-0.05 for highest versus lowest tertile) (P for trend = <0.0001) and BCC (OR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.19 for highest versus lowest tertile) (P for trend = <0.0001). Conclusion: Telomere length may be involved in the development of skin cancer, although the effect on cancer risk differs for melanoma and non-melanoma carcinomas. Our findings suggest that long telomere length is positively associated with melanoma while inversely associated with SCC and BCC. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据