4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Whole-body vibration: Evaluation of emission and exposure levels arising from agricultural tractors

期刊

JOURNAL OF TERRAMECHANICS
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 65-73

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2006.01.006

关键词

tractors; agricultural; whole-body vibration; emissions; exposure; limit; physical agents (vibration) directive

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted to quantify whole-body vibration (WBV) emission and estimated exposure levels found upon a range of modern, state-of-the-art agricultural tractors, when operated in controlled conditions (traversing ISO ride vibration test tracks and performing selected agricultural operations) and whilst performing identical tasks during 'on-farm' use. The potential consequences of operator WBV exposure limitations, as prescribed by the European Physical Agents (Vibration) Directive:2002 (PA(V)D), upon tractor usage patterns were considered. Tractor WBV emission levels were found to be very dependent upon the nature of field operation performed, but largely independent of vehicle suspension system capability (due to the dominance of horizontal vibration). However, this trend was reversed during on-road transport. Few examples (similar to 9%) of tractor field operations approached or exceeded the PA(V)D Exposure Limit Value (ELV) during 8 h operation, but this figure increased (to 27%) during longer working days. However virtually all (similar to 95%) 'on-farm' vehicles exceeded the Exposure Action Value (EAV) during an 8-h day. The PA(V)D is not likely to restrict the operation of large, state-of-the-art tractors during an 8-h day, but will become a limitation if the working day lengthens significantly. Further 'on-farm' WBV data collection is required to enable creation of a robust, generic WBV emission database for agricultural tractor operations, to enable estimation of likely WBV exposure by employers. (c) 2006 ISTVS. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据