期刊
FAITH AND PHILOSOPHY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 52-71出版社
PHILOSOPHY DOCUMENTATION CENTER
DOI: 10.5840/faithphil200724136
关键词
-
In a pair of recent articles, Brian Leftow and Eleonore Stump off er independent, although similar, accounts of the metaphysics of the Incarnation. Both believe that their Aquinas-inspired theories can off er solutions to the kind of Leibniz's Law problems that can seem to threaten the logical possibility of this traditional Christian doctrine. In this paper, I'll have a look at their compositional account of the nature of God incarnate. In the end, I believe their position can be seen to have unacceptable philosophical and theological implications, and that is it inadequate to solve the Leibniz's law problems that motivate it in the first place.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据