4.3 Article

Green tea polyphenol suppresses tumor invasion and angiogenesis in N-butyl-(-4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine-induced bladder cancer

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 350-354

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.03.001

关键词

Cancer prevention; Green tea polyphenol; Chemical-induced model; Angiogenesis; Bladder cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Green tea polyphenol (GTP) suppresses malignancy in bladder cancer cell lines. However, the detail of its anti-carcinogenic effect in vivo is not fully understood. This study investigated the effect of GTP on bladder tumor size and angiogenesis in mice given N-butyl-(-4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine (BBN), with and without GTP. Methods: Eight-week-old female C3H/He mice were treated with and without 0.05% BBN solution for 14 or 24 weeks. In addition, they were also treated with and without 0.5% GTP solution for the same periods. Histopathological diagnosis was established using hematoxylin and eosin staining, and microvessel density (MVD) was estimated by counting CD34- and von Willebrand factor-positive vessels in the tumor area. Results: At 14 weeks, cancer cells were detected in BBN and BBN + GTP mice [5/14 (35.7%) and 3/14 (21.4%), respectively, p = 0.678]. At 24 weeks, the incidence of cancer cells was also Similar between the groups (BBN + GTP: 61.9% vs. BBN: 82.6%; p = 0.179). However, the frequency of invasive tumors in BBN + GTP mice was significantly lower (23.8%; p = 0.030) than in those given BBN alone (65.2%). Tumor volume and MVD of intratumoral and stromal region in the BBN + GTP group were also significantly lower than in BBN mice. Conclusion: The results showed that GTP had no anti-carcinogenic effect, but inhibited tumor growth and invasion in mice with established bladder cancer, at least in part through the regulation of angiogenesis. Our data suggest that GTP seems to suppress tumor development in bladder cancer. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据