4.6 Article

The effect of COX-2 inhibitor, nimesulide, on angiogenetic factors in primary endometrial carcinoma cell culture

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 6-10

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-007-0119-x

关键词

endometrial carcinoma; COX-2 inhibitor; vascular endothelial growth factor; monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; interleukin-8

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis, the development of new blood vessels from preexisting capillaries, is essential for the development, growth and advancement of solid tumours. Angiogenesis is enhanced by prostaglandins (PGs) that are synthesised by the catalysis of cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) from arachidonic acid. COX-2 is upregulated in a variety of malignancies and favours the growth of malignant cells by stimulating proliferation and angiogenesis. The aim of this study is to investigate the angiogenetic process by determining the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and interleukin (IL)-8 in endometrial cancer cells and to study the effect of nimesulide, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, on these mediators using cell culture. Endometrial tissue specimens were obtained from subjects with endometrial cancer and intramural leiomyoma. Cells were incubated with either 10 or 50 mu M nimesulide for 24 h. VEGF, MCP-1 and IL-8 concentrations were determined by sandwich quantitative enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). VEGF concentration was significantly higher in cancer cells than normal endometrial cells. VEGF was decreased with 10 mu M nimesulide in cancer cells whereas it remained unaltered in normal cells. Both MCP-1 and IL-8 concentrations were lower in cancer cells than normal cells. MCP-1 levels were decreased with both doses of nimesulide in normal cells, whereas IL-8 levels were significantly affected only by 50 mu M of nimesulide. These results suggest that COX-2 inhibitors may be effective in the treatment of endometrial cancer via suppression of angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据