4.1 Article

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Widespread Pain A Randomized Controlled Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECT
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 57-66

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000125

关键词

transcranial magnetic stimulation; chronic widespread pain; fibromyalgia

资金

  1. National Institute for Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [R21 AR053963]
  2. Bipolar Illness Fund
  3. National Institute of Mental Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Our objective was to assess transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the treatment of chronic widespread pain. Methods: Nineteen participants were randomized into 2 groups: one group receiving active TMS (n = 7) and another group receiving sham stimulation (n = 11) applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. During sham stimulation, subjects heard a sound similar to the sound heard by those receiving the active treatment and received an active electrical stimulus to the scalp. The stimulation protocol consisted of 15 sessions completed within a 4-week period. Blind assessments were done at baseline and after each 5 sessions followed by blind assessments at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the last TMS sessions. The primary outcome variable was a pain measure, the Gracely Box Intensity Scale (BIRS). Results: The percentage of subjects who guessed that they were receiving TMS was similar in the 2 groups. Both the TMS group and the sham group showed a statistically significant reduction in the BIRS scores from baseline during the acute phase of treatment and the follow-up phase. However, the TMS and sham groups did not differ in the change in the BIRS scores. Discussion: Although some previous clinical studies and basic science studies of TMS in treating pain are promising, this study found no difference in the analgesic effect of TMS and sham stimulation. Future studies should use a sham condition that attempts to simulate the sound and sensation of the TMS stimulation. Stimulus location and other stimulus parameters should be explored in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据