4.4 Article

Over-expression of MDR1 in amrubicinol-resistant lung cancer cells

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 669-676

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-010-1533-4

关键词

Amrubicin; Amrubicinol; Drug resistance; Lung cancer; MDR1; P-glycoprotein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amrubicin, a totally synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline anticancer drug, has shown promising activity for lung cancer, but little is known about the mechanism of resistance for this agent. This study was aimed to clarify the role of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in amrubicinol, an active metabolite of amrubicin, resistance in lung cancer cells. Amrubicinol-resistant cell line PC-6/AMR-OH was developed by continuously exposing the small-cell lung cancer cell line PC-6 to amrubicinol. Gene expression level of MDR1, which encodes P-gp, and intracellular accumulation of amrubicinol were evaluated by PC-6 and PC-6/AMR-OH cells. The involvement of MDR1 in amrubicinol resistance was evaluated by treatment with P-gp inhibitor verapamil and small interfering RNA (siRNA) against MDR1. Also, expression levels and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MDR1 in 22 lung cancer cell lines were examined, and the relationships between these factors and sensitivity to amrubicinol were evaluated. The MDR1 gene was increased approximately 4,500-fold in PC-6/AMR-OH cells compared with PC-6 cells, and intracellular accumulation of amrubicinol in PC-6/AMR-OH cells was decreased to about 15 percent of that in PC-6 cells. Treatment with verapamil and siRNA against MDR1 significantly increased the sensitivity to amrubicinol in PC-6/AMR-OH cells with increased cellular accumulation of amrubicinol. Meanwhile, neither MDR1 gene expression levels nor SNPs of the gene were associated with amrubicinol sensitivity. Results of this study indicate that increased MDR1 expression and P-gp activity confer acquired resistance to amrubicinol. In contrast, neither expression level nor SNPs of MDR1 are likely to be predictive markers for amrubicin activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据