4.4 Article

Predictive factors for the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy as salvage therapy in metastatic gastric cancer patients

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 579-587

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1067-9

关键词

Gastric cancer; Cetuximab; Chemotherapy; Skin rash; Performance status; K-ras; Predictor

资金

  1. Research Institute and Hospital
  2. National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients previously treated with chemotherapy and to investigate potential predictors of treatment efficacy in those patients. Thirty-two patients with MGC were included in this study. Cetuximab was delivered, often combined with irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Thirty patients were analyzed for K-ras mutations via direct sequencing of the tumor DNA. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median number of three previous lines of palliative chemotherapy (56% of the patients were refractory to all of the following drugs: fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) and 53% of the patients displayed poor performance status. Of 28 response-assessable patients, the overall response rate to cetuximab plus chemotherapy was 3.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-10.5%] and the disease control rate was 28.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.7 months (95% CI 1.3-2.1 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.4-5.0 months). Multivariate analyses revealed that skin rash and performance status were significantly associated with PFS and OS. The presence of a K-ras mutation (13.3%) was not associated with either PFS or OS. Our study suggests that MGC patients with good performance status and skin rash benefit most from salvage cetuximab combined with chemotherapy, even in heavily pretreated status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据