4.4 Article

Current and potential therapeutic strategies for the treatment of ataxia-telangiectasia

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
卷 81-82, 期 -, 页码 129-147

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldm012

关键词

ataxia-telangiectasia; neurodegeneration; ATM; antioxidants; mutation-targeted therapy

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI067769] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35322] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI067769] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS035322] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder characterized by progressive neurodegeneration, a high risk of cancer and immunodeficiency. These patients are also hypersensitive to radiotherapy. The gene product defective in this syndrome, ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated), normally recognizes DNA damage and signal to the DNA repair machinery and the cell cycle checkpoints to minimize the risk of genetic damage. No curative strategy for this disease exists. Treatment has focused on slowing the progress of the neurodegeneration; devising approaches for the treatment of tumours while minimizing side effects and treatment with immunoglobulin for the immunodeficiency. The most debilitating feature of this disorder is the progressive neurodegeneration due to loss of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum and malfunction of other neuronal cells. Correcting for the loss of Purkinje cells is technically very difficult and would require transplantation of embryonic stem cells. However, since it seems likely that oxidative stress may contribute to the neurodegeneration in A-T, potential therapies based on the use of antioxidants offer some hope. We describe the natural course of disease, some supportive therapeutic approaches already in use and those with potential based on our knowledge of molecular and cellular characteristics of this disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据