4.4 Article

Intensive anti-inflammatory therapy with dexamethasone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: effect on chemotherapy toxicity and efficacy

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 731-743

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-008-0767-x

关键词

Dexamethasone; Hematologic toxicity; Chemotherapy; Lung cancer

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company ( JJR)
  2. Buck-Kentucky Lung Cancer Research Chair
  3. Markey Cancer Center and the Markey Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Our preclinical and clinical data suggest that pretreatment with dexamethasone 4 days prior to chemotherapy increased the efficacy and decreased the toxicity of carboplatin and gemcitabine. To translate these findings to patients, we have undertaken a Phase 1/2 clinical trial. Methods Thirty patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin, AUC 5.5 on day 1. Patients were randomized (1: 2: 2) to receive, no dexamethasone (cohort 1), or oral dexamethasone at 8 mg (cohort 2) or 16 mg (cohort 3) twice per day, 4 days before and of the day of chemotherapy. Dexamethasone was administered to patients in cohorts 2 and 3 during courses 2-4. Results In cohorts 1, 2, and 3, patients completing four planned courses of therapy were: 1/6, 6/12, 9/12. Partial responses (RECIST) were: 2/6, 6/12, and 7/12. Overall, dexamethasone significantly improved AGC and platelet nadirs and recovery times. There were no significant differences in non-hematologic toxicities between cohorts and no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between course 1 and 2 in any cohort. Conclusions These data support our previous preclinical and clinical observations that dexamethasone pre-treatment decreases hematopoietic toxicity and improves efficacy of this chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and suggests that further randomized trials should be undertaken.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据