4.6 Article

Intraspecific and Interspecific Variations in the Mitochondrial Genomes of Nilaparvata (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 2021-2029

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov122

关键词

planthopper; mitochondrial DNA; intra-or interspecific diversity; biotype; evolution

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [1104002]
  2. Special Fund for Commonwealth Industry from the Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China [200803003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Planthoppers in the genus Nilaparvata Distant are serious pests of rice and many other crops in tropical and temperate Asia, and northern Australia. In this study, the mitochondrial genomes of four Nilaparvata planthoppers were sequenced, three in Nilaparvata lugens Stal and one in Nilaparvata muiri China. Mitochondrial genome of Nilaparvata contain the standard set of 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, and a control region. The nucleotide composition of Nilaparvata mitochondrial sequence is biased toward adenine and thymine, and the amino acid composition is affected to a similar degree by the bias to AT. We compare the four mitochondrial genomes and find intra-and interspecific variation in gene length, base composition, nucleotide and amino acid substitutions, intergenic spacer length, and gene overlap. The intra-and interspecific variations reveal that nucleotide and amino acid substitutions in mitochondrial protein-coding genes make a contribution to the formation of various insect biotypes in one species. Furthermore, the accumulation of nonsynonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial protein-coding genes, as well as differences in start codons, the length of intergenic spacers, and gene overlap regions contribute to differences between the two species investigated here. In addition, cox is the most conserved gene family and nad4-nad4l cluster is variable in Nilaparvata mitochondrial genes for the intra-and interspecific variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据