4.4 Article

Immediate loading of two implants supporting a ball attachment-retained mandibular overdenture: A prospective clinical study

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00051.x

关键词

dental implant; freestanding attachments; immediate loading; overdenture; retentive ball anchors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A prospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate clinically and radiographically the performance of two implants immediately loaded supporting a ball attachment-retained mandibular overdenture. Materials and Methods Seventeen completely edentulous patients were included in the study. Each patient received two implants inserted after a minimal flap reflection and no vestibular extension in order to reduce the postoperative swelling and facilitate immediate prosthesis connection. After implant placement, a mandibular complete denture was connected to the implants using ball attachments of appropriate height according to the depth of the peri-implant tissue. Patients were asked not to remove the denture for 1 week. No limitations to chewing function were given. At implant placement, the maximum value of insertion torque was recorded. Patients were examined at 1, 2, 4, 12, and 52 weeks postsurgery. At postoperative visit, occlusion was checked and the need for any prosthesis maintenance was recorded. The radiographic bone level (RBL) change was measured on periapical radiographs at baseline and 12 months after loading. Results After 12 months of loading, no implant failure was reported and the survival rate was 100%. Average RBL change was 0.7 mm +/- 0.5 mm. Of the 17 cases, two had major prosthetic complications and five patients required minor extra maintenance appointments. Conclusions The immediate loading of two implants by means of ball attachment-retained mandibular complete denture may be a predictable treatment option. This clinical approach offers increased stability and comfort, while keeping a high implant success rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据