4.5 Article

Chemical mutagenesis - A promising technique to increase metal concentration and extraction in sunflowers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 9, 期 1-3, 页码 149-165

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226510701232880

关键词

Helianthus annuus L.; mutagenesis; ethyl methanesulfonate; phytoextraction; metal concentration; non-GMO approach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since most of the metal-hyperaccumulating wild plants only produce very low biomass and many high-yielding crops accumulate only moderate amounts of metals, the current research is mainly focused on overcoming these limitations and the optimization of metal phytoextraction. The main goal of the present study was the improvement of metal concentration and extraction properties of Helianthus annuus L by chemical mutagenesis (the non-GMO approach). Sunflowers-hybrid cultivar Saint and inbred lines-were treated with the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). The effect of chemical mutagenesis on metal concentration in and extraction by new sunflower M-1 and M-2 mutants was directly assessed on a metal-contaminated field in Rafz, Switzerland. Mutants of the M-2 generation showed a 2-3 times higher metal shoot concentration than the control plants. The best M-2 sunflower giant mutant 14/185/04 showed a significantly enhanced metal extraction ability: 7.5 times for Cd, 9.2 times for Zn, and 8.2 times for Pb in aboveground parts, as compared to the control plants. Theoretical calculations for the phytoextraction potential of new sunflower variants note that the best sunflower mutant can produce up to 26 1 dry matter per hectare and remove 13.3 kg Zn per hectare and year at the sewage sludge contaminated site of Raft; that is a gain factor of 9 compared to Zn extraction by sunflower controls. Furthermore, the use of sunflower oil and biomass for technical purposes (lubricants, biodiesel, biogas) should produce an additional value and improve the economical balance of phytoextraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据