4.8 Article

BCR-ABL1 Compound Mutations Combining Key Kinase Domain Positions Confer Clinical Resistance to Ponatinib in Ph Chromosome-Positive Leukemia

期刊

CANCER CELL
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 428-442

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS)
  3. BMS
  4. Celgene
  5. Gilead
  6. ARIAD
  7. Georgia Cancer Coalition
  8. NIH/NCI [R01 CA178397]
  9. American Society of Hematology
  10. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  11. NIH/NCI MERIT [R37CA065823]
  12. NIH [R01 CA178397, HL082978-01, 5 P01 CA049639-23]
  13. University of Utah Department of Medicinal Chemistry
  14. XSEDE supercomputers [TG-CHE120086]
  15. Director's Discretionary Program (Epigenetics)
  16. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  17. [P30 CA042014]
  18. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC)
  19. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0910735] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ponatinib is the only currently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that suppresses all BCR-ABL1 single mutants in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia, including the recalcitrant BCR-ABL1(T315I) mutant. However, emergence of compound mutations in a BCR-ABL1 allele may confer ponatinib resistance. We found that clinically reported BCR-ABL1 compound mutants center on 12 key positions and confer varying resistance to imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, ponatinib, rebastinib, and bosutinib. T315I-inclusive compound mutants confer high-level resistance to TKIs, including ponatinib. In vitro resistance profiling was predictive of treatment outcomes in Ph+ leukemia patients. Structural explanations for compound mutation-based resistance were obtained through molecular dynamics simulations. Our findings demonstrate that BCR-ABL1 compound mutants confer different levels of TKI resistance, necessitating rational treatment selection to optimize clinical outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据