4.3 Article

Tobacco smoke and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: findings from the SETIL case-control study

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 683-692

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-014-0371-9

关键词

Case-control studies; Leukemia; lymphoid; Prenatal exposure delayed effects; Tobacco smoke pollution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tobacco smoke could cause childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) through at least three pathways: (1) prenatal parental smoking; (2) fetal exposure through maternal smoking during pregnancy; and (3) childhood exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS). We tested these hypotheses in a large population-based case-control study (SETIL) primarily designed to evaluate the role of electromagnetic fields in childhood hematopoietic malignancies. From 1998 to 2003, we enrolled 602 incident cases of ALL from 14 Italian Regions, and 918 controls were individually matched by birthdate, sex, and area of residence. Cases (n = 557) and controls (n = 855) with complete information were analyzed; odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were estimated with logistic regression models conditioned on matching variables and adjusted by birth order, birthweight, duration of breastfeeding, parental age at delivery, education, and occupational exposure to benzene. No evidence associating paternal smoking in the conception period or maternal smoking during the pregnancy with ALL was found. An association of ALL with maternal exposure to SHS during pregnancy (adjusted OR for mothers exposed more than 4 h/day = 2.18, 95 % CI 1.39-3.42) was observed, but recall bias cannot be excluded. Exposure of the children to SHS was associated with ALL only in unadjusted analysis (unadjusted OR for highly exposed children = 1.64; 95 % CI 1.10-2.45). This study does not support the hypothesis that parental active smoking is associated with ALL. We found very weak evidence of increased risk of ALL for children exposed to SHS. Maternal exposure to SHS was associated with ALL, but recall bias is likely to inflate our estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据