4.6 Article

Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: A single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 177, 期 6, 页码 2300-2305

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.02.002

关键词

urolithiasis; kidney calculi; citric acid; calcium; diagnostic imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The incidence of kidney stones in adults has increased in the last 30 years. This retrospective, single site review was done to test the hypotheses that the incidence of urolithiasis in pediatric patients increased from 1994 to 2005, and that metabolic abnormalities were more common in patients with renal stones in the final 3 years of the study period. Materials and Methods: Charts from 2 time periods were reviewed, 1994 to 1996 (period 1) and 2003 to 2005 (period 2). Clinical and laboratory data, including demographics, presenting complaints, laboratory assessment, treatment and outcome, were tabulated in patients with confirmed urolithiasis. Results: The number of patients with urolithiasis increased from 7 in period I to 61 in period 2. When expressed as cases per 100 new patients the incidence increased 4.6 times (p = 0.014). Focusing on period 2, 28% of patients were younger than 10 years. While blood tests were generally normal, 76% of patients had at least 1 abnormality in the 24-hour urine collection. Hypocitraturia, which was the most common metabolic abnormality, was noted in 52% of patients. The small number of patients in period 1 precluded determination as to whether metabolic abnormalities were more common in period 2. Surgery and/or lithotripsy was required in 12 children. Stone disease recurred in 39% of the patients. Conclusions: The incidence of urolithiasis in the pediatric population increased nearly 5-fold at our institution during the last decade. We recommend that the primary diagnostic test be a 24-hour urine collection. The most common metabolic abnormality was hypocitraturia, followed by hypercalciuria. Recurrence of stones is common (approximately 40% rate) and followup is advised.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据