4.3 Article

Television viewing time of colorectal cancer survivors is associated prospectively with quality of life

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 1111-1120

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9786-8

关键词

Colorectal neoplasms; Survivorship; Health behavior; Quality of life; Longitudinal studies

资金

  1. Cancer Council Queensland
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [586727, 569940]
  3. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Fellowship
  4. Queensland Health Core Research Infrastructure grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine prospective associations of television viewing time with quality of life, following a colorectal cancer diagnosis. One thousand, nine hundred and sixty-six colorectal cancer survivors were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry. Interviews were conducted at 5, 12, 24, and 36 months post-diagnosis. Generalized linear mixed models estimated the effects of television viewing time on quality of life. Participants who watched a parts per thousand yen5 h of television per day had a 16% lower total quality of life score than did participants reporting a parts per thousand currency sign2 h per day. Deleterious associations of television viewing time were found with all quality of life subscales: functional well-being showed the strongest association (23% difference in quality of life scores between highest and lowest television viewing categories), and social well-being the weakest association (6% difference). Participants who increased their television viewing by one category (e.g., a parts per thousand currency sign2 h, increasing to 3-4 h per day) had a proportional decrease of some 6% in their quality of life score (intra-individual effect). The deleterious associations of television viewing time with quality of life were clinically significant and consistent over time. Decreasing sedentary behavior may be an important behavioral strategy to enhance the quality of life of cancer survivors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据