4.3 Article

A case-control study of ultraviolet radiation exposure, vitamin D, and lymphoma risk in adults

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 1265-1275

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9554-1

关键词

Case-control studies; Epidemiology; Lymphoma; Ultraviolet radiation; Vitamin D

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [T32 HL007152]
  2. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources [UL 1 RR024160]
  4. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [K23 CA102216, P50 CA130805]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent research suggests that ultraviolet radiation exposure (UVRE), our major source of vitamin D, is associated with reduced lymphoma risk. Animal and human studies support an association between vitamin D (vitD) insufficiency and increased risk of some malignancies. We conducted a clinic-based case-control study (140 lymphoma cases, 139 controls; 2002-2005, Rochester, NY) to evaluate UVRE and vitD insufficiency in relation to lymphoma risk. Subjects completed a survey and provided a blood sample. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate lymphoma risk in relation to past (5-10 years prior) UVRE and current vitD insufficiency (determined by serum 25(OH)D). Possible differences in effect by lymphoma subtype were explored, but statistical power was limited. We confirmed the previously reported decrease in lymphoma risk with past UVRE, specifically sunbathing (> once/week versus never); adjusted odds ratio (ORadj), = 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-0.79. Current vitD insufficiency was not associated with lymphoma risk (ORadj = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.47-1.72). However, current sunbathing frequency was correlated with measured serum 25(OH)D values. Therefore, while our data do not support an association with current vitD status, development of accurate methods for past vitD assessment to further investigate its role in the association between past UVRE and lymphoma risk is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据