4.3 Article

Associations of circulating C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 with cancer risk: findings from two prospective cohorts and a meta-analysis

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 15-26

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-008-9212-z

关键词

Cancer; Inflammation; C-reactive protein; Interleukin-6; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Department of Health. Grants from the British Heart Foundation
  2. (UK) Department of Health career scientist award
  3. (UK) Medical Research Council PhD Studentship
  4. ESRC [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0600705] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the associations of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) with cancer risk. We examined the associations of CRP and IL-6 with incident cancer in two prospective cohorts, the British Women's Heart and Health Study (4,286 women aged 60-80) and the Caerphilly Cohort (2,398 men aged 45-59) using Cox regression and pooled our findings with previous prospective studies' in fixed and random effects meta-analyses. CRP and IL-6 were associated with some incident cancers in our cohorts, but the numbers of cancer cases were small. In our meta-analyses elevated CRP was associated with an increased overall risk of cancer (random effects estimate (RE): 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.18) and lung cancer (RE: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.61). Its associations with colorectal (RE: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.21) and breast cancer risks (RE: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.26) were weaker. CRP appeared unrelated to prostate cancer risk (RE: 1.00 0.88, 1.13). IL-6 was associated with increased lung and breast cancer risks and decreased prostate cancer risk, and was unrelated to colorectal cancer risk. Our findings suggest an etiological role for CRP and IL-6 in some cancers. Further large prospective and genetic studies would help to better understand this role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据