4.4 Article

Repeated Radioimmunotherapy with 177Lu-DOTA-BR96 in a Syngeneic Rat Colon Carcinoma Model

期刊

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 134-140

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2011.1080

关键词

colon carcinoma; fractionation; Lutetium-177; metastases; radioimmunotherapy

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. Mrs. Berta Kamprad's Foundation
  3. Gunnar Nilsson's Foundation
  4. Crafoord Foundation
  5. Governmental Funding of Clinical Research within the National Health Service
  6. Lund University Medical Faculty Foundation
  7. Lund University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Fractionation is generally used as a mean to improve radioimmunotherapy (RIT). Since RIT is considered suitable for small-volume disease, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether repeated administration of Lu-177-labeled mAb BR96 was tolerated and could delay or prevent metastatic disease after complete remission of the tumor obtained by the first administration. Methods: Immunocompetent rats bearing a syngeneic colon carcinoma were first treated with 400 MBq/kg Lu-177-DOTA-BR96, an activity resulting in complete response in 29 of 30 animals. On day 21, two groups of rats were given an additional activity of 150 or 350MBq/kg resulting in total administered activities corresponding to 0.9 and 1.3 times the maximal tolerated dose. Results: The additional treatment resulted in tolerable myelotoxicity; however, the frequency of metastatic disease and survival were not affected. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated binding of the BR96 antibody to tissue sections of analyzed metastases. Conclusions: In our model, development of metastatic disease after treatment of the manifest tumor was not prevented by an additional treatment with the same radioimmunoconjugate. Therefore, the antibody should be labeled with a more suitable radionuclide for treatment of metastases. The repeated targeted therapy was well tolerated in aspects of myelotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据