4.6 Article

Resistance of Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) to Fumigation with Phosphine

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 2489-2495

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov193

关键词

stored product; cigarette beetle; discriminating dose; resistance management; fumigant alternative

资金

  1. Turkish Higher Educational Council (YOK)
  2. Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre under the Australian Governmen's Cooperative Research Centres Program [PBCRC3035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lasioderma serricorne (F.) is a serious pest of stored products that is known to be resistant to the fumigant pesticide gas phosphine. This study investigated resistance in populations from the southeastern United States, and determined if a recommended treatment schedule could kill resistant insects. A laboratory assay for adult insects was developed that used a discriminating concentration of 50 ppm phosphine applied to insects for 20 h at 25A degrees C followed by 7 d of recovery in air. Survivors were classified as resistant. L. serricorne from six different field populations associated with stored tobacco were surveyed with the assay and all had resistant individuals. Four populations had greater than 90% of their insects resistant. Two industry-recommended treatment schedules were evaluated in laboratory fumigations against mixed life stage cultures of the four most resistant populations: the first at 200 ppm for 4 d at 25A degrees C for controlling phosphine-susceptible L. serricorne and the second at 600 ppm for 6 d at 25A degrees C intended to control phosphine-resistant beetles. The four populations with the highest frequency of resistant individuals from the field sampling study were not controlled by the normal treatment intended for susceptible insects. The higher concentration treatment greatly reduced beetle progeny from mixed-stage colony jars, but there were substantial numbers of surviving adults from all four highly resistant populations that represented unacceptable levels of control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据