4.6 Article

Dynamic factor models with infinite-dimensional factor spaces: One-sided representations

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS
卷 185, 期 2, 页码 359-371

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.10.017

关键词

Generalized dynamic factor models; Vector processes with singular spectral density; One-sided representations for dynamic factor models

资金

  1. PRIN-MIUR Grant [2010J3LZEN-003]
  2. Sonderforschungsbereich Statistical modelling of nonlinear dynamic processes of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 823]
  3. Belgian Science Policy Office Interuniversity Attraction Pole [20122017]
  4. ESRC [RES-000-22-3219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Factor model methods recently have become extremely popular in the theory and practice of large panels of time series data. Those methods rely on various factor models which all are particular cases of the Generalized Dynamic Factor Model (GDFM) introduced in Forniet al. (2000). That paper, however, rests on Brillinger's dynamic principal components. The corresponding estimators are two-sided filters whose performance at the end of the observation period or for forecasting purposes is rather poor. No such problem arises with estimators based on standard principal components, which have been dominant in this literature. On the other hand, those estimators require the assumption that the space spanned by the factors has finite dimension. In the present paper, we argue that such an assumption is extremely restrictive and potentially quite harmful. Elaborating upon recent results by Anderson and Deistler (2008a, b) on singular stationary processes with rational spectrum, we obtain one-sided representations for the GDFM without assuming finite dimension of the factor space. Construction of the corresponding estimators is also briefly outlined. In a companion paper, we establish consistency and rates for such estimators, and provide Monte Carlo results further motivating our approach. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据