4.6 Article

Mercury(II) and methylmercury determination in water by liquid chromatography hyphenated to cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry after online short-column preconcentration

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 2699-2706

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ay02929a

关键词

-

资金

  1. DGCYT [CTQ2010-15377/BQU]
  2. Grup de Recerca Consolidat [SGR2009-1188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a method developed for the simultaneous determination of methylmercury (MeHg+) and mercury(II) (Hg2+) species in water by liquid chromatography coupled to online UV irradiation and cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry (LC-UV-CV-AFS) after online short-column preconcentration. This work focused on systematic studies of several variables to establish the maximum species recoveries, preconcentration factors and good reproducibility. The optimum results obtained were the following: 0.07 mmol L-1 2-mercaptoethanol as a complexing agent, precolumn conditioning with the mobile phase: a mixture of 80% of methanol (MeOH) and 20% of the following buffer: 0.0015 mol L-1 ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (APDC) and 0.01 mol L-1 ammonium acetate (NH4CH3COO) at pH 5.5, 2 cm precolumn length and 2 mL min(-1) sample flow. This method was applied to three water samples with different mineralisation contents. Various tests, based on spikes, were performed on each sample. A breakthrough volume of 4 mL was found. The recovery values of 72 +/- 3% and 81 +/- 5% for MeHg+ and Hg2+, respectively, were obtained regardless of the matrix composition, and the PF values were 30 and 32 for MeHg+ and Hg2+, respectively. The accuracy of the preconcentration method was verified by analysing a certified reference material. The detection limits (LDs) obtained were 15 ng L-1 for MeHg+ and 2 ng L-1 for Hg2+. The quantification limits (LQs) were 50 ng L-1 for both species. The established analytical online preconcentration method is suitable for the quantification of mercury species in a wide range of environmental waters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据