4.6 Article

Correlation between the spatial distribution of circumstellar disks and massive stars in the open cluster NGC 6611

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 462, 期 1, 页码 245-U22

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066124

关键词

stars : formation; planetary systems : protoplanetary disks; stars : pre-main sequence; open cluster and associations : individual : NGC 6611; infrared : stars; X-ray : stars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The observation of young stars with circumstellar disks suggests that the disks are dissipated, starting from the inner region, by the radiation of the central star and eventually by the formation of rocky planetesimals, over a time scale of several million years. It was also shown that strong UV radiation emitted by nearby massive stars can heat a circumstellar disk up to some thousand degrees, inducing the photoevaporation of the gas. This process strongly reduces the dissipation time scale. Aims. We study whether there exists a correlation between the spatial distribution of stars with circumstellar disks and the position of massive stars with spectral class earlier than B5, in the open cluster NGC 6611. Methods. We created a multiband catalog of the cluster, down to V similar to 23(m), using optical data from a WFI observation at 2.2 m of ESO in the BVI bands, the 2MASS public point source catalog and an archival X-ray observation made with CHANDRA/ACIS. We selected the stars with infrared excess (due to the emission of a circumstellar disk) using suitable color indices independent of extinction, and studied their spatial distribution. Results. The spatial distribution of the stars with K band excess (due to the presence of a circumstellar disk) is anti correlated with that of the massive stars: the disks are more frequent at large distances from these stars. We argue that this is in agreement with the hypothesis that the circumstellar disks are heated by the UV radiation from the massive stars and photoevaporated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据