4.7 Article

CHARA Array K '-band measurements of the angular dimensions of Be star disks

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 654, 期 1, 页码 527-543

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/509144

关键词

stars : emission-line, Be; stars : individual (gamma Cas; phi Per; zeta Tau; kappa Dra); techniques : interferometric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first K'-band, long-baseline interferometric observations of the northern Be stars gamma Cas, phi Per, zeta Tau, and kappa Dra. The measurements were made with multiple telescope pairs of the CHARA Array interferometer and in every case the observations indicate that the circumstellar disks of the targets are resolved. We fit the interferometric visibilities with predictions from a simple disk model that assumes an isothermal gas in Keplerian rotation. We derive fits of the four model parameters ( disk base density, radial density exponent, disk normal inclination, and position angle) for each of the targets. The resulting densities are in broad agreement with prior studies of the IR excess flux, and the resulting orientations generally agree with those from interferometric H alpha and continuum polarimetric observations. We find that the angular size of the K' disk emission is smaller than that determined for the H alpha emission, and we argue that the difference is the result of a larger H alpha opacity and the relatively larger neutral hydrogen fraction with increasing disk radius. All the targets are known binaries with faint companions, and we find that companions appear to influence the interferometric visibilities in the cases of phi Per and kappa Dra. We also present contemporaneous observations of the H alpha, H gamma, and Br gamma emission lines. Synthetic model profiles of these lines that are based on the same disk inclination and radial density exponent as derived from the CHARA Array observations match the observed emission line strength if the disk base density is reduced by approximate to 1.7 dex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据