4.7 Article

Colistin offers prolonged survival in experimental infection by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: the significance of co-administration of rifampicin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.09.009

关键词

colistin; Acinetobacter; rifampicin; multidrug resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of colistin on bacterial eradication and survival was tested in experimental infection by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. The thigh infection model was applied in 86 neutropenic Wistar rats. Six rats were used for the induction of neutropenia and for the selection of the dose regimen of colistin; the remainder was equally divided into four groups: A, controls; B, rifampicin; C, colistin; and D, both agents. Therapy was administered 5 h after bacterial challenge; 5 mg/kg of rifampicin was administered intravenously and 3 mg/kg of colistin intramuscularly. Survival was recorded in 10 animals of each group. The remaining 10 rats per group were killed 4h after therapy; blood and tissue samples were sampled. Median survival of animals of groups A, 13, C and D was 2.00, 2.50, 4.00 and 4.00 days, respectively (P = 0.0048 between A and C and P = 0.0012 between A and D. Mortality rates after 6 days of follow-up were 100, 100, 100 and 70%, respectively (P = 0.018 between groups). Statistically significant decreases of bacteria were found in blood, liver, lung and spleen of group B compared with A; in lung of group C compared with A; and in blood and liver of group D compared with A. Colistin was effective in prolonging survival in an experimental thigh infection by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii in neutropenic rats. Its activity was enhanced after co-administration with rifampicin. These results mandate the application of colistin in the event of infections by multidrug-resistant pathogens and the need for its co-administration with rifampicin. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据