4.4 Article

Comparison of usefulness of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing an emergent coronary procedure

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 781-786

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.098

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the case of an emergency coronary procedure where the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy is especially high, there are few reliable methods to attenuate renal injury. We examined the efficacy of sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing an emergency coronary procedure. We enrolled 59 patients who were scheduled to undergo an emergency coronary angiography or intervention. These patients were randomized to receive a 154-mEq/L infusion of sodium bicarbonate (n = 30) or sodium chloride (n = 29), as a bolus of 3 ml/kg/hour for 1 hour before the administration of contrast, followed by an infusion of 1 ml/kg/hour for 6 hours during and after the procedure. In the sodium bicarbonate group, serum creatinine concentration remained unchanged within 2 days of contrast administration (1.31 +/- 0.52 to 1.31 +/- 0.59 mg/dl), whereas it increased in the sodium chloride group (1.32 +/- 0.65 to 1.52 +/- 0.92 mg/dl, p = 0.01). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (an increase > 0.5 mg/dl or > 25% in serum creatinine concentration within 2 days of contrast) was significantly lower in the sodium bicarbonate group than in the sodium chloride group (7% vs 35%, p = 0.01, risk ratio 0.19,95% confidence interval 0.046 to 0.80). In conclusion, hydration with sodium bicarbonate is more effective than with sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing an emergency coronary procedure. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据