4.7 Article

Patterns of Locoregional Treatment for Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer by Patient and Health System Factors

期刊

CANCER
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 790-799

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29092

关键词

breast cancer; breast-conserving surgery (BCS); cancer registry; nonmetastatic; disparity

类别

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through California Cancer Registry (Public Health Institute) [1-U01-DP000260]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Emory University [1-U01-DP000258]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center [1-U01-DP000253]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (Minnesota Department of Health) [1-U01-DP000259]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Medical College of Wisconsin [1-U01-DP000261]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through University of Kentucky [1-U01-DP000251]
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Wake Forest University [1-U01-DP000264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this study was to examine local definitive therapy for nonmetastatic breast cancer with the Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer (POCBP) study of the National Program of Cancer Registries (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). METHODSPOCBP medical record data were re-abstracted in 7 state/regional registry systems (Georgia, North Carolina, Kentucky, Louisiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and California) to verify data quality and assess treatment patterns in the population. National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice treatment guidelines were aligned with American Joint Committee on Cancer staging at diagnosis to appraise care. RESULTSSix thousand five hundred five of 9142 patients with registry-confirmed breast cancer were coded as having primary disease with stage 0 to IIIA tumors and were included in the study. Approximately 88% received guideline-concordant locoregional treatment. However, this outcome varied by age group: 92% of women < age 50 versus 80% of women age 70 years old received guideline care (P<0.01). Characteristics that best discriminated receipt (no/yes) of guideline-concordant care in receiver operating curve analyses were the receipt of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy (C=0.70), patient age (C=0.62), a greater tumor stage (C=0.60), public insurance (C=0.58), and the presence of at least mild comorbidity (C=0.55). Radiation therapy (RT) after BCS was the most omitted treatment component causing nonconcordance in the study population. In multivariate regression, the effects of the treatment facility, ductal carcinoma in situ, race, and comorbidity on nonconcordant care differed by age group. CONCLUSIONSPatterns of underuse of standard therapies for breast cancer vary by age group and BCS use, with which there is a risk of omission of RT. Cancer 2015;121:790-799. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. In a large national database, the likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care among patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer is lower with older age and with public insurance versus private insurance. Radiation therapy is the most omitted treatment component. Patient navigation targeted at high-risk or vulnerable patients may be needed to ensure access to high-quality care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据