4.6 Article

Mitochondrial function in sepsis: Acute phase versus multiple organ failure

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 S441-S448

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000278049.48333.78

关键词

sepsis; multiple organ failure; mitochondria; metabolism; oxygen consumption; hibernation; biogenesis

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. MRC [G0500712] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0500712] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe temporal changes in mitochondrial function during the septic process, including the recovery phase. Design: Literature review. Subjects: Clinical studies and laboratory models. Main Results: Biochemical and ultrastructural mitochondrial abnormalities have been recognized in in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro laboratory models of sepsis for >30 yrs. Short-term models show variable effects on mitochondrial function and structure; this is likely related to differences in model design, including species, organs studied, degree of septic insult, and degree of resuscitation. Longer-term models more consistently reveal mitochondrial dysfunction and damage. There is a rebound increase in oxygen consumption and resting energy expenditure in the recovery phase of sepsis. This could reflect mitochondrial recovery (biogenesis) that may restore the energy supply needed to fuel restorative metabolic processes and enable patient survival. Conclusion: Mitochondrial dysfunction seems to be intrinsically involved in the pathogenesis of multiple organ failure. As a consequence of a progressive decrease in energy availability, metabolism must decrease or the cell will die. The interplay between adenosine 5'-triphosphate supply and demand, dictated by the degree of mitochondrial dysfunction and the level of metabolic shutdown (analogous to a hibernation-type response), seems to be crucial in determining outcome. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. (Crit Care Med 2007; 35[Suppl.]:S441-S448)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据