4.7 Article

Molecular Analyses of 6 Different Types of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: Emphasis in Atypical Leiomyoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 120, 期 20, 页码 3165-3177

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28900

关键词

uterine smooth muscle tumor; leiomyosarcoma; atypical leiomyoma; microRNA signature; gene mutations; tumorigenesis

类别

资金

  1. Edna Foundation of Hope
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [81272857]
  3. Baskes Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Uterine smooth muscle tumors (USMTs) constitute a group of histologic, genetic, and clinical heterogeneous tumors that include at least 6 major histologically defined tumor types: leiomyoma (ULM), mitotically active leiomyoma (MALM), cellular leiomyoma (CLM), atypical leiomyoma (ALM), uncertain malignant potential (STUMP), and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Apart from ULM and LMS, the nature of these variants is not well defined. METHODS: A total of 167 cases of different USMT variants were collected, reviewed, and diagnostically confirmed based on the World Health Organization and Stanford schemes. These included 38 cases of LMS, 18 cases of STUMP, 42 cases of ALM, 22 cases of CLM, 7 cases of MALM, and 40 cases of ULM. Molecular analysis included selected microRNAs (miRNAs), oncogenes, and tumor suppressors that are highly relevant to USMT. RESULTS: Overall, 49% (17/35) of LMS cases and 7% (1/14) of STUMP cases died due to their USMT, but no deaths were attributed to ALM. miRNA profiling revealed that ALM and LMS shared similar miRNA signatures. P53 mutations and PTEN deletions were significantly higher in LMS, ALM, and STUMP compared with other USMT variants (P<.01). In contrast, MED12 mutations were extremely common in ULM and MALM (>74%) but were significantly less common (<15%) in CLM, ALM, STUMP, and LMS (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Six types of USMT have different gene mutation fingerprints. ALM shares many molecular alterations with LMS. Our findings suggest that ALM may be a precursor lesion of LMS or have similar genetic changes during its early stage. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据