4.7 Review

Small Cell Lung Cancer: Where Do We Go From Here?

期刊

CANCER
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 664-672

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29098

关键词

small cell lung cancer; genomics; proteomics; translational research; novel therapies

类别

资金

  1. R. Lee Clark Fellow Award
  2. Jeane F. Shelby Scholarship Fund
  3. MDACC Physician Scientist Award
  4. NCI Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease that accounts for approximately 14% of all lung cancers. In the United States, approximately 31,000 patients are diagnosed annually with SCLC. Despite numerous clinical trials, including at least 40 phase 3 trials since the 1970s, systemic treatment for patients with SCLC has not changed significantly in the past several decades. Consequently, the 5-year survival rate remains low at <7% overall, and most patients survive for only 1 year or less after diagnosis. Unlike nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in which major advances have been made using targeted therapies, there are still no approved targeted drugs for SCLC. Significant barriers to progress in SCLC include 1) a lack of early detection modalities, 2) limited tumor tissue for translational research (eg, molecular profiling of DNA, RNA, and/or protein alterations) because of small diagnostic biopsies and the rare use of surgical resection in standard treatment, and 3) rapid disease progression with poor understanding of the mechanisms contributing to therapeutic resistance. In this report, the authors review the current state of SCLC treatment, recent advances in current understanding of the underlying disease biology, and opportunities to advance translational research and therapeutic approaches for patients with SCLC. Cancer 2015;121:664-672. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. The treatment of small cell lung cancer has not changed significantly in 3 decades. In this review, the authors discuss the current challenges and opportunities to accelerate progress in this highly lethal disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据