4.7 Review

Prostate Cancer Collaborative Stage Data Items-Their Definitions, Quality, Usage, and Clinical Implications: A Review of SEER Data for 2004-2010

期刊

CANCER
卷 120, 期 23, 页码 3758-3770

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29052

关键词

prostate cancer; collaborative stage; American Joint Committee on Cancer staging; TNM stage; Gleason score; prostate specific antigen; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. University of Southern California [HHSN261201300004I]
  3. Cancer Prevention Institute of California [HHSN261201300005I]
  4. University of Hawaii [HHSN261201300009I]
  5. University of New Mexico [HHSN261201300010I]
  6. Rutgers University [HHSN261201300021I]
  7. Connecticut Department of Health [HHSN261201300019I]
  8. University of Iowa [HHSN261201300020I]
  9. Emory University [HHSN261201300015I]
  10. Louisiana State University [HHSN261201300016I]
  11. University of Utah [HHSN2612 01300017I]
  12. Wayne State University [HHSN261201300011I]
  13. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center [HHSN261201300012I]
  14. University of Kentucky [HHSN261201300013O]
  15. Public Health Institute [HHSN261201300014I]
  16. Information Management Services, Inc. [HHSN261201100007I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDVersion 2 of the Collaborative Stage Data Collection System (CSv2) became effective with cases diagnosed in 2010. This report focuses on the CSv2 components required to derive the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage for prostate cancer and on the site-specific factors for prostate cancer captured in CSv2. The report also highlights differences between the AJCC 6th and 7th editions for classifying prostate cancer stage. METHODSData from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program population-based registries (SEER-18) were analyzed for the years 2004-2010, which included 400,591 prostate cancer cases. RESULTSCSv2 provides specificity with regard to the Gleason grading system by distinguishing between clinical and pathologic patterns and scores. The AJCC 7th edition incorporates prostate-specific antigen values into staging, subdivides stage II into IIA and IIB, and reclassifies extraprostatic invasion with microscopic bladder neck invasion from T4 in the 6th edition to T3a; this latter change affected the AJCC stage of 283 cases in 2010. Of the 44,578 prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2010 that would have been classified as stage II in the AJCC 6th edition, 32.7%, 27.5%, and 39.8% are classified as stages I, IIA, and IIB, respectively, in the 7th edition. CONCLUSIONSCSv2 provides more information than was previously available to researchers using SEER prostate data. The absence of a clearly defined clinical stage for each prostate case is the overriding limitation that researchers face in relying on Collaborative Stage information to analyze prostate cancer data. Cancer 2014;120(23 suppl):3758-70. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. This report focuses on aspects of the Collaborative Stage Data Collection System for prostate cancer that researchers should be aware of when analyzing SEER or other North American cancer registry data. This report also highlights differences between the American Joint Committee on Cancer's 6th and 7th editions for classifying prostate cancer stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据