4.7 Review

Overview of Breast Cancer Collaborative Stage Data Items-Their Definitions, Quality, Usage, and Clinical Implications: A Review of SEER Data for 2004-2010

期刊

CANCER
卷 120, 期 23, 页码 3771-3780

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29059

关键词

breast cancer; collaborative stage; AJCC; prognostic; site-specific factors

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. University of Southern California [HHSN261201300004I]
  3. Cancer Prevention Institute of California [HHSN261201300005I]
  4. University of Hawaii [HHSN261201300009I]
  5. University of New Mexico [HHSN261201300010I]
  6. Rutgers University [HHSN261201300021I]
  7. Connecticut Department of Health [HHSN261201300019I]
  8. University of Iowa [HHSN261201300020I]
  9. Emory University [HHSN261201300015I]
  10. Louisiana State University [HHSN261201300016I]
  11. University of Utah [HHSN261201300017I]
  12. Wayne State University [HHSN261201300011I]
  13. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center [HHSN261201300012I]
  14. University of Kentucky [HHSN261201300013O]
  15. Public Health Institute [HHSN261201300014I]
  16. Information Management Services, Inc. [HHSN261201100007I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries began collecting new data items, known as site-specific factors (SSFs), related to breast cancer treatment, prediction, and prognosis under the Collaborative Stage version 2 (CSv2) Data Collection System for cases diagnosed in 2010. The objectives of this report are to: 1) assess the completeness of the new SSFs and discuss their limitations and 2) discuss key changes in American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging between the 6th and 7th editions. METHODSWe used data from the 18 SEER population-based registries (SEER-18), which included 71,983 women diagnosed with breast cancer in 2010. RESULTSOf the 18 SSFs examined in this study, 6 SSFs were more than 75% complete. Information on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), was available for more than 90% of the invasive breast cancer cases. These data are required to categorize the distinct subtypes of breast cancer. The majority of cases also had information on other prognostic factors such as Bloom-Richardson score/grade (83%) and the size of invasive component in the tumor (76%). As a result of changes in staging criteria, nearly 10% of cases categorized as stage IIA according to the 6th edition of the AJCC staging manual were downstaged to stage IB under the 7th edition. CONCLUSIONSThe Collaborative Stage data collection system enables registries to collect current, relevant, and standardized data items that are consistent with the evolving view of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease. Cancer 2014;120(23 suppl):3771-80. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. This report discusses the utility and limitations of the new breast cancer variables to be collected under the Collaborative Stage Data Collection System for researchers who intend to analyze these variables using population-based SEER or other North American cancer registry data. The report also highlights differences between the American Joint Committee on Cancer's (AJCC) 6th and 7th editions for classifying breast cancer stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据