4.5 Article

-391 C to G substitution in the regulator of G-protein signalling-2 promoter increases susceptibility to the metabolic syndrome in white European men: consistency between molecular and epidemiological studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 117-125

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280109c6c

关键词

adipocytes; clinical genetics; epidemiology; metabolic syndrome; molecular biology; syndrome X

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The regulator of G-protein signalling-2 (RGS2) is a key factor in adipogenesis. We hypothesized that the metabolic syndrome, of which obesity is an important component, might be related to genetic variation in RGS2. Methods and results We screened the human RGS2 gene. We tested the functionality of a common genetic variant in vitro, ex vivo, and in epidemiological study involving six European populations. The C to G substitution at position -391 in the RGS2 promoter was associated with enhanced RGS2 expression in vitro in transfected 3T3-L1 adipocytes and Chinese hamster cells and ex vivo in adipocytes from male, but not female, volunteers. In 2732 relatives from 512 families and 348 unrelated individuals, randomly recruited from six European populations, the prevalence of GG homozygosity was 54.1%. The metabolic syndrome score, a composite of six continuous traits making up this clinical entity, was 0.27 standardized units higher (P < 0.001) in 795 GG homozygous men compared with 683 men carrying the C allele. Transmission of the -391 G allele to male offspring was associated with a 0.20 unit increase in the score (P=0.039). These epidemiological relations were not significant in 1602 women. Conclusions The C to IS substitution at position -391 in the RGS2 promoter increases RGS2 expression in adipocytes and is associated with the metabolic syndrome in white European men. Further experimental and clinical research should establish whether this common polymorphism might be a target for preventive or therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据