4.7 Article

Pharmacological induction of ischemic tolerance by glutamate transporter-1 (EAAT2) upregulation

期刊

STROKE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 177-182

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000252091.36912.65

关键词

ceftriaxone; cerebral ischemia; excitotoxicity; ischemic tolerance; glutamate transporter-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Astrocytic glutamate transporter protein, GLT-1 (EAAT2), recovers extracellular glutamate and ensures that neurons are protected from excess stimulation. Recently, beta-lactam antibiotics, like ceftriaxone (CTX), were reported to induce the upregulation of GLT-1. Here, we investigated ischemic tolerance induction by CTX in an experimental model of focal cerebral ischemia. Methods-CTX (200 mg/kg per day, IP) was administered for 5 consecutive days before transient focal ischemia, which was induced by intraluminal thread occlusion of the middle cerebral artery for 90 minutes or permanently. Results-Repeated CTX injections enhanced GLT-1 mRNA and protein expressions after 3 and 5 days of treatment, respectively. CTX-pretreated animals showed a reduction in infarct volume by 58% (reperfusion) and 39% (permanent), compared with the vehicle-pretreated animals at 24 hours postischemia (P < 0.01). Lower doses of CTX (20 mg/kg per day and 100 mg/kg per day) reduced infarct volumes to a lesser degree. The injection of GLT-1 inhibitor (dihydrokainate) at 30 minutes before ischemia ameliorated the effect of CTX pretreatment. However, CTX administration at 30 minutes after ischemia produced no significant reduction in infarct volume. CTX reduced the levels of proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-a, FasL), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and activated caspase-9 (P < 0.01). In addition, CTX-pretreated animals showed better functional recovery at day I to week 5 after ischemia (P < 0.05). Conclusions-This study presents evidence that CTX induces ischemic tolerance in focal cerebral ischemia and that this is mediated by GLT-1 upregulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据